The future of the newsroom will be quite different than the one we are used to today.
In between the rocket-powered jetpacks and the daily food injections, journalists will be part of a “virtual” newsroom existing at a nexus of user-contributed information, original investigative articles and computer-assisted reporting reliant on flexible databases and easily mashable formats.
These journalists will find themselves less like the Woodward and Bernstein of yore, and more like traffic cops helping direct the flow of digital traffic in an age where everyone has one ear to the cyber ground.
The primary difference between the current newsroom – an odd assortment of desktop computers, cubicles, yelling and strange smells – is that the newsroom of the future won’t exist, at least not in the physical sense.
This trend has already occurred in blogs and on smaller, newer websites and is even causing some experimentation in larger organizations such as Time Inc., which is trying it out.
Max Chafkin writes on Inc.com that the rapid advances in technology have made telecommunication less costly and less complicated and that “today, thanks to the widespread availability of free, easy-to-use communications technologies, a lot of telecommuting consultants are out of business — and most virtual companies end up without offices not as a result of some heated planning meeting, but simply by accident.”
With wireless Internet in abundance and the advent of powerful laptops and mobile phones, journalists can write stories, take photos and video, and upload all of it to the web with little or no trouble at all. The communication, give-and-take and collaboration that traditionally took place in newsrooms would be replaced with chat rooms, phone calls and sampling the opinions of the crowd.
The loss of a concrete journalism cage would evolve parallel to a more decentralized management and collaboration structure. Gone will be the one reporter who turns in an extensive story on his own. This will be replaced by a culture of mutual collaboration and a return of the “rewrite” desk made up of people who will take the chunks and bits of information from the crowd and from journalists and will help shape multimedia stories and reports.
Each person involved in this chain will have experience on multiple platforms, and will know what it takes to maximize impact on each.
This will result in a broad range of content across numerous platforms, meaning that the newsroom of the future “will deliver the news in whatever way the community craves and is economically feasible, including online video, audio, print, online, mobile, TV or radio. Each locality will decide what’s necessary to meet their needs,” according to Mark Glaser from MediaShift.
The organization of the news room will be less linear, and input will flow from more than just one direction. Journalists, freelancers and citizens will all contribute to projects, and journalists and management in turn will include citizens in discussions about future coverage and potential projects.
But not all stories can be given the proper context on human voices alone, which means another key segment of the newsroom of the future has to be based on the hum of computers and the imaginary sound of numbers crunching.
It’s because Americans live in a world of data. We are surrounded by countless polls, studies, research articles and surveys, and for a long time those results were published in a story format with a bar graph, or perhaps a pie chart.
Typical stories drew the determinations for the reader, and presented the information in a much-simplified format. But as the Internet begins to put pressure on organizations and governments to release more and more data, the future of the newsroom will be in taking the data and making it easily available and linked to other sets of data.
It is no longer enough to tell someone that cases of swine flu are on the rise – the future of journalism will be in allowing people to personalize the data in ways that are meaningful to them, with just the click of a few buttons. The Centers for Disease Control data on swine flu could be linked with the National Institutes for Health to paint a more complete picture.
That same data can be linked with government spending on flu awareness and education to see the impact of government funding on the rates of swine flu across the country.
A guest author at ReadWriteWeb writes that all of these comparisons “lead to new insight and all of these things happen only when the walls around an institution become porous.” The future newsroom will be a more of a weigh station for data than a final destination. Journalists will use the data to power their own stories, and give people the tools to apply these numbers to their own lives, or for their own interests.
The future newsroom will be funded in a myriad of ways, with no one approach dominating the industry, such as display advertising had once done. Instead, publications will pursue a sort of “breadbasket” of options, including some display advertising and sponsorships, payment for special convenience in the form of apps or programs, and user-supported journalism. (For more info about payment method possibilities, see the Pew research on the subject.)
Nothing will be off the table; even limited chances for merchandising will be part of the larger occasion. Much like American dependence on fossil fuels, alternative energies encompass a wide variety of solutions; the financing of journalism will follow the same route.
Edward Wasserman, the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation Professor of Journalism Ethics at Washington and Lee University in Lexington agrees, saying on his blog that news organizations “have to get hungry and get busy, developing new money streams from micropayments, online ads of all kinds, premium news spinoffs sold to targeted audiences, branded online offerings, special live events, social media mini-networks, custom publishing, snazzy sponsorships for specialized one-off publications, handouts from philanthropists or the general public—whatever jingles in the till.”
For too long journalism had existed on an unstable foundation, and without a diversified approach, the future will not be on solid footing.
But most important of all, the future newsroom will no longer be dependent on others to point the way toward new technology. Newsrooms will be proactive in identifying emerging technologies and programs and incorporating them into their journalism portfolio.
News companies will no longer be blindsided by rapid advances in technology. Instead, news companies will embrace and adapt to the constantly shifting digital landscape and the public’s sometimes fickle adoption of different programs.
In the ideal future newsroom, larger organizations will lead the push for better, more flexible technologies and programs as part of a larger mission of serving the public and its population of cooperating citizens. In this future newsroom, journalism will be able to fly as high as our jetpacks, hover cars and personal spaceships can take us.

June 1st, 2010
admin
Posted in
Tags: 


I like this article, and I like the links you have chosen. I think it would be more effective with a few changes — see if you agree.
1. Kill paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and 5. I almost didn’t read the rest of this post b/c I started to think it was a bunch of idle navel-gazing. Then it started to sound like something thoughtful and original in paragraph 6.
2. In p.6: “telecommunication” is totally NOT the same as telecommuting.
3. The bridge between p. 1 and p.6 should be that the new newsroom is dispersed and not bound to a physical place. When I opened the link to Chafkin’s article, I was surprised and very interested to discover that the magazine had gone virtual. The top of your story would be more intriguing, I think, if you made it clear that’s what you are getting at. As it is, I didn’t get that until deeper in.
4. “It’s because Americans live in a world of data. We are surrounded by countless polls, studies …” First, it’s NOT ONLY Americans. Europeans and people in urban centers in every relatively “free” country have the same data flood. Second, you have hit on what I think of as two of THREE key points about data: linked, and contextualized. But you also need to think about simplification for the mass audience — and that might mean building the data graphics in modular fashion, so the use can click in for more … and more.
5. “For too long journalism had existed on an unstable foundation, and without a diversified approach, the future will not be on solid footing.” This is good, and it’s good that it stands alone. But as I read it a couple of times, I felt like something is missing. It almost has a very strong impact — but not quite. I think it might be b/c of the mixed metaphor (foundation/footing).
6. “… larger organizations will lead the push for better, more flexible technologies and programs as part of a larger mission of serving the public and its population of cooperating citizens.” Why “larger organizations”? They have not done well up till now. Maybe they are too inflexible b/c of their size.
7. Although your final sentence goes back to the Jetsons vision of the future you had in the lede, I fee that lede makes your story sound trite and unoriginal, so I suggest jettisoning the jetpacks both at the beginning and at the end. Your conclusion is positive and upbeat, and that’s good. But the triteness of the jetpack thing kind of wrecks it.
I hope you don’t mind my writing this to you. I don’t usually critique blog posts in this way, but I really liked about 75 percent of your post, and I’d like to assign it to my journalism students to read. But I’m reluctant to do so with the current top (on your post) b/c I think my students would not read past graf 4 or 5.
[...] The Future of Journalism: The Web 3.0 Newsroom | Andy Medici: Journalist (tags: journalism news newsroom onlinenewspapers future) [...]
[...] This new post is an edited piece of an earlier post. Special thanks to journalist and journalism teacher Mindy McAdams for her comments and [...]
Hey there! I just discovered your blog today while searching for a few various health terms in bing. Stuck around a little to check things out and read a few of your articles… good stuff. I’ll be sure that I get about again some time in the next few weeks. Go Portugal!! World Cup 2010!
[...] leave a comment » From Andy Medici’s blog: [...]
Good day. I just simply wanted to let you know that some parts of the site can be problematic to read for me, as I’m color blind. I am troubled by deuteranopia, then again you will find more kinds of colour blindness which could also get difficulties. I can understand the biggest part of the web site Ok, and the places I have issues with I’m able to read by using a particular internet browser. All the same, it would be awesome if you could keep in mind us color-blind folks when doing the following site update. Thank you.
You capture the sense of what the future newsroom might be like, namely entirely digital internet based, very nicely. I think the idea that the journalist is a director and organizer, a traffic cop, of information is right on. One of the greatest problems that the internet in general has given rise to is the sheer flood of information to which people have access. This access increase the element of “noise” such that even if all the useful information on a given subject is available no one person is able to find it. Journalists have really always been the masters of uncovering and organizing information, but the way in which those services are now required have changed radically. There are some great interviews with top journalists and researchers, many especially aimed at the subject of technology and its influence on the future of journalism, at http://www.ourblook.com/topic/future_of_journalism.html which I have found very useful on these subjects as well.